Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Cox v. New York State et al
as 1:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
Henry Cox
Defendant:
New York State and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00799
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Steele v. State of New York et al
as 5:2020cv00220
Defendant:
Elatisha Kirnon, State of New York, New York State Department of Transportation and others
Plaintiff:
Richard S. Steele
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Malloy v. Sopchak et al
as 1:2018cv01460
Defendant:
Matthew Seeber, John/Jane Doe # 3, Albany County/City and others
Plaintiff:
Javar Malloy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alexander v. Murphy et al
as 5:2018cv00607
Plaintiff:
Samuel Alexander
Defendant:
Thomas J. Murphy, Pappas, Cox, Kimpel, Dodd & Levine, PC and Greene, Hershdorfer & Sharpe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jeanty v. City of Utica et al
as 6:2016cv00966
Plaintiff:
Vladimir Jeanty
Defendant:
City of Utica , Mark Williams , Michael F. Cerminaro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunt v. Cox et al
as 1:2014cv01588
Plaintiff:
Patricia Hunt
Defendant:
Cynthia L. Cox, Elizabeth Curra and Manuel Casares
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Masihuddin v. Lane et al
as 3:2011cv00993
Plaintiff:
Ruknuddin Masihuddin
Defendant:
Dale Lane , J. Holleran , C. Smales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fudge v. Onondaga County et al
as 5:2011cv00525
Plaintiff:
Anthony Fudge
Defendant:
Onondaga County, William Jones, Timothy Hines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
