Cases 11 - 20 of 32,900
Burrell v. Van Winkler et al
as 6:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
Ako K. Burrell
Defendant:
State of New York DOCCS, N. Pezdek, LaPorte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Euson, Jr v. TRC Engineers, LLC
as 5:2024cv01168
Defendant:
TRC Engineers, LLC
Plaintiff:
Thomas Euson, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Allen v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv01173
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Brent Michael Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Thompson et al v. United States of America et al
as 8:2024cv01163
Defendant:
United States Customs and Border Protection, Northland Associates, Inc., Town of Massena and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Robertson, Sheryl Thompson and Estate of Aspen Robertston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01166
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bishop v. St. Lawrence County, New York et al
as 9:2024cv01164
Defendant:
Undersheriff Shawn C. McCargar, St. Lawrence County, New York, St. Lawrence County Sheriff's Office and others
Plaintiff:
Darren Bishop
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 1:2024cv01153
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 3:2024cv01161
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv01162
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 3:2024cv01165
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
