Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Cases 11 - 20 of 298
Jones v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv00965
Plaintiff: Colleen R. Jones
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Robinson v. Jones
as 9:2023cv00959
Petitioner: Christopher E. Robinson
Respondent: Gerald Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. et al
as 5:2023cv00956
Plaintiff: Shariff Ahmad Jones
Defendant: JP Morgan Chase & Co., JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and Susan Buzzard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00859
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jones v. Campbell
as 1:2023cv00732
Plaintiff: Dayshaun Jones
Defendant: Jeffrey Campbell
Jones v. Hochul et al
as 9:2023cv00720
Plaintiff: Daniel Jones
Defendant: Kathlee C. Hochul, Letitia James, Ann Marie T. Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2023cv00692
Plaintiff: Natalie Katherine Jones
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jones v. Ellis We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00656
Plaintiff: Dayshaun Jones
Defendant: Matthew Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Fowler v. Hummel et al
as 9:2023cv00607
Plaintiff: Joseph V. Fowler
Defendant: Christian Hummel, E. Stewart Jones, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Farney We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00563
Plaintiff: Dayshaun Jones
Defendant: Jon Farney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?