Cases 11 - 20 of 129
In Re: Megan A. Rogers
as 5:2022pf00004
In Re:
Megan A. Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rogers v. Kijakazi
as 5:2022cv01061
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Rena Rogers
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rogers v. McMahon et al
as 5:2022cv00994
Plaintiff:
Megan Rogers
Defendant:
Ryan McMahon, City Planning and Aquarium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rogers v. Benedict et al
as 5:2022cv00801
Plaintiff:
Megan Rogers
Defendant:
Michael Benedict, Rudolph Sohl, Sara Sohl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bedore v. Lind
as 8:2022cv00473
Plaintiff:
David H. Bedore
Defendant:
Roger Lind
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burrell v. Central New York Psychiatric Center et al
as 9:2022cv00344
Plaintiff:
Ako K. Burrell
Defendant:
Central New York Psychiatric Center, D. McIntosh, C. Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Sullivan et al
as 9:2022cv00124
Plaintiff:
Allen Rogers Scott
Defendant:
Ann Marie T. Sullivan, Daniell Dill, Mr. Jamie Temple and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, et al
as 5:2021cv01351
Plaintiff:
Megan A. Rogers, Jebo, Hubert Rogers and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of the Treasury, U.S. Department of Treasury - IRS, Marcus Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garcia v. Garland et al
as 9:2021cv01255
Plaintiff:
Germaine Manuel Aybar Garcia
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Congress, Roger Sagerman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Gantner et al
as 9:2021cv01257
Plaintiff:
Germaine Manuel Aybar Garcia
Defendant:
Mary Ann Gantner, Daniel W. Kelly, Roger Sagerman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
