Cases 21 - 30 of 50
Piccard v. Paddon et al
as 1:2016cv00420
Plaintiff:
Matthew Piccard
Defendant:
John Paddon, Christina Paddon, John Paddon & Son Paving and Construction, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sexton et al v. S. Curtis Hayes, Inc.
as 8:2015cv01070
Plaintiff:
Martin L. Sexton and Georganne C. Sexton
Defendant:
S. Curtis Hayes, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Haye v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2015cv00363
Plaintiff:
Glennis M. Haye
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hayes v. Annucci et al
as 9:2015cv00081
Plaintiff:
Earl Hayes
Defendant:
Anthony Annucci, Brian Fischer and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frisone v. Ulster County New York, et al
as 1:2014cv00562
Plaintiff:
Joseph Frisone
Defendant:
Ulster County, New York , Michael Hein , John J. Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2013cv01566
Plaintiff:
Cheri L. Hayes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Upstate New York Engineers Health Fund et al v. Hayes Paving, Inc., et al.
as 5:2013cv01225
Plaintiff:
Upstate New York Engineers Health Fund , Upstate New York Engineers Pension Fund , Upstate New York Engineers S.U.B. Fund and others
Defendant:
Hayes Paving, Inc. and Brian Hayes
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Hayes v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp. et al
as 5:2013cv00696
Plaintiff:
Nancy J. Hayes
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. and Stryker Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Vail v. Fischer et al
as 9:2012cv01718
Plaintiff:
Andrew Vail
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, Thomas LaValley, Bran Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes v. Astrue
as 5:2012cv01387
Plaintiff:
Sabrina D. Hayes
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
