Cases 31 - 40 of 102
Fancher v. Carter Express Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00172
Defendant:
Carter Express Inc. and Demetrius L. Erby
Plaintiff:
Tamie Fancher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Bernier v. Carter et al
as 9:2017cv01376
Plaintiff:
Manfred Bernier
Defendant:
Mr. Carter, Mr. King, Mr. Dickson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
James v. Doty et al
as 9:2017cv01145
Plaintiff:
Carlton M. James
Defendant:
A. Doty, Vincent L. Leon, K. Kavaughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Harper et al
as 9:2017cv01093
Plaintiff:
Deering Carter
Defendant:
Orlando Harper, Williams, Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Grand Forks Regional Child Support Unit et al
as 6:2017cv01091
Plaintiff:
Derek James Carter
Defendant:
Grand Forks Regional Child Support Unit, High Intensity Enforcement Unit, Oneida County Child Support and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2017cv00297
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Grand Jury, Sovereigns of the Court v. U.S. Congress et al
as 1:2016cv01490
Defendant:
U.S. Congress, Ben Sasse, David Scott and others
Plaintiff:
Grand Jury, Sovereigns of the Court
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0101 Ethics in Government Act
Fair v. Annucci et al
as 9:2016cv01434
Petitioner:
Keith Darnell Fair
Respondent:
Anthony Annucci, Ann Marie T. Sullivan, Jacob Lew and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Samuels v. The County of Montgomery et al
as 6:2016cv01241
Plaintiff:
Jose Samuels
Defendant:
The County of Montgomery, Michael Amato, Michael Franko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carter v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 6:2016cv01237
Plaintiff:
Martha Carter
Defendant:
Sanofi S.A., Aventis Pharma S.A. and Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
