Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Jones v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. et al
as 5:2023cv00956
Plaintiff:
Shariff Ahmad Jones
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase & Co., JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and Susan Buzzard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Dixon v. The City of Syracuse et al
as 5:2020cv00381
Defendant:
Police Officer Leonard Brown, Former Police Officer Ahmad Mims, Police Officer Vogel and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Elisens v. Cayuga County Mental Health et al
as 5:2019cv01236
Defendant:
Cayuga County Mental Health, Dr. Ahmad Bilal, Dr. Michael Pratts and others
Plaintiff:
Brent Allen Elisens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Sankara v. The State of New York et al
as 9:2018cv01214
Defendant:
John Doe(s), Officer Anderson, The State of New York and others
Plaintiff:
Ahmadou Sankara
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sankara v. Martuscello
as 9:2018cv00699
Respondent:
Daniel F. Martuscello, Jr.
Petitioner:
Ahmadou Sankara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sankara v. Gonyea et al
as 9:2018cv00534
Defendant:
Brinkerhoff, Hobart, Cieslak and others
Plaintiff:
Ahmadou Sankara
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sankara v. Annucci
as 9:2017cv00673
Petitioner:
Ahmadou Sankara
Respondent:
Anthony J. Annucci
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sankara v. The State of New York et al
as 9:2016cv00885
Plaintiff:
Ahmadou Sankara
Defendant:
The State of New York, L. Reed, Mastropietro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Atiyeh v. Colvin
as 5:2016cv00392
Plaintiff:
Ahmad Atiyeh
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Townsend v. GHI et al
as 1:2013cv01599
Plaintiff:
Nadine Townsend
Defendant:
GHI and Ahmad Alabbadi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
