Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Stephens et al v. County of Broome et al
as 3:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Lori Cordi, Paula Stephens, Lori Cliburn and others
Defendant:
County of Broome and Jane St. Amour
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Duncan v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 5:2020cv01045
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, C R Bard Inc, Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
Darcy Duncan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kennebrew v. CR Bard Inc et al
as 3:2020cv00947
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Kennebrew
Defendant:
CR Bard Inc, Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated, McKesson Corporation and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Britney Rawlings, Phyllis Bennett and Darcy Duncan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wood v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2019cv00641
Plaintiff:
Darcy Ann Wood
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
Allen v. Riehlman, Shafer & Shaw, LLC
as 5:2017cv00144
Plaintiff:
Darcie Allen
Defendant:
Riehlman, Shafer & Shaw, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Copeland v. Weaver et al
as 9:2015cv00366
Plaintiff:
Darcy A. Copeland , Jr.
Defendant:
Weaver, Barr, Bergman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chevalier et al v. Civil Service Employees Association, Inc.
as 1:2010cv00446
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Chevalier , Deborah Gray , Harold Gray and others
Defendant:
Civil Service Employees Association, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0401
Panetta v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2007cv01265
Plaintiff:
Darcy Panetta
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
