Cases 1 - 10 of 138
Nieves v. Barker et al
as 9:2024cv00983
Defendant:
C.O. Bass, C.O. O'Brien, C.O. Loci and others
Plaintiff:
Elvin B. Nieves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Akshar
as 3:2024cv00942
Plaintiff:
Thomas C. Williams
Defendant:
Frederick J. Akshar, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fredricks v. Hurd et al
as 9:2024cv00910
Plaintiff:
Nigel Fredericks and Nigel Fredricks
Defendant:
Daniel J. Stewards and David N. Hurd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fredricks v. May et al
as 9:2024cv00719
Defendant:
John Doe Correction Officer and C. May
Plaintiff:
Nigel Fredricks and Nigel Fredericks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Florance v. Broome County et al
as 9:2024cv00536
Plaintiff:
Thomas Florance
Defendant:
Broome County, Frederick J. Akshar, Robert Charpinsky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frederick v. Uhler
as 9:2024cv00305
Petitioner:
Marquise Frederick
Respondent:
Donald J. Uhler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Doyle et al v. Town of Manlius, New York et al
as 5:2023cv01467
Plaintiff:
Frederick Doyle and Jody Doyle
Defendant:
Town of Manlius, New York, John Deer, Sara Bollinger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Weeden v. Babcock et al
as 3:2023cv00769
Plaintiff:
Paul J. Weeden, Jr.
Defendant:
Frederick Babcock and Village of Walton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Schultz v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00723
Plaintiff:
Frederick C Schultz, Jr
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Yarbrough v. Broome County, New York et al
as 3:2023cv00671
Plaintiff:
Sara-Judith: Yarbrough
Defendant:
Broome County, New York, Town of Barker, New York, Jason T. Garnar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
