Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Ware v. Boutin et al
as 9:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
Khyrel Ware
Defendant:
Boutin, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dorcinvil v. Annucci et al
as 9:2023cv01378
Plaintiff:
Jacques Dorcinvil
Defendant:
Anthony Annucci, Sean Milligan, Laura Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hilton v. Caringi et al
as 9:2023cv00209
Plaintiff:
James D. Hilton
Defendant:
Caringi, Mahan, McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DuBois v. St. Louis et al
as 9:2022cv00929
Plaintiff:
Charles DuBois
Defendant:
J. St. Louis, C.O. D. Beane, L. Gadway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Staine v. Hochul et al
as 9:2022cv00866
Plaintiff:
Eric Staine
Defendant:
Kathy Hochul, Letitia James, Anthony Annucci and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vargas v. Kessler et al
as 9:2022cv00862
Plaintiff:
Antonio Vargas
Defendant:
C.O. Kessler, Derocco, John Doe #6 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sierra v. John Doe 22 et al
as 9:2022cv00711
Plaintiff:
Leonidas Sierra
Defendant:
John Doe 22, Captain Rzerniak, J. Fitchette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carlisle v. Jefferson County et al
as 5:2022cv00200
Plaintiff:
Steven Carlisle
Defendant:
Jefferson County, Colleen O'Neil, Charles Donoghue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Williamson et al
as 9:2022cv00174
Plaintiff:
Sincere Smith
Defendant:
ORC Williamson, ORC Rena, ORC Piersma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Addison et al v. City of Albany et al
as 1:2021cv00629
Defendant:
John Doe #5, John Doe #4, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Desiree Shuman and Kimani Addison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
