Cases 1 - 10 of 10
U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. v. McKinney et al
as 1:2017cv00182
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank Trust, N.A.
Defendant:
Barry McKinney and Debra A. McKinney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McKinney v. Miller et al
as 9:2015cv01019
Petitioner:
Darrell McKinney
Respondent:
Christopher Miller and Anthony J. Annucci
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Yagan v. Syracuse City Court Judges Fifth Judicial District et al
as 5:2008cv01176
Plaintiff:
Desiree Yagan
Defendant:
Syracuse City Court Judges Fifth Judicial District, All Judges within the Fifth Judicial District, Stephen Dougherty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McKinney v. Bradt
as 9:2009cv01377
Petitioner:
Michael McKinney
Respondent:
Mark L. Bradt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yagan v. Fitzpatrick et al
as 5:2008cv01100
Plaintiff:
Desiree Yagan
Defendant:
William Fitzpatrick, Michael A. Price, James Maxwell and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Benitez v. Perry et al
as 9:2007cv01089
Plaintiff:
Henry Benitez
Defendant:
P. Perry, J. Price, A. Leclaire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boykin v. Commissioner of NYS DOCS et al
as 9:2007cv01004
Plaintiff:
Connie Boykin
Defendant:
Commissioner of NYS DOCS, Harold McKinney, Commissioner of Health and Hospital for NYS DOCS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilkins v. McKinney
as 9:2007cv00689
Petitioner:
Raymond Wilkins
Respondent:
Harold McKinney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Palmer v. McKinney
as 9:2007cv00360
Petitioner:
Paul Palmer
Respondent:
Harold McKinney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Matos v. McKinney et al
as 9:2007cv00336
Plaintiff:
Hector Matos, Jr.
Defendant:
T. McKinney, T. Smith, McWilliams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
