Cases 101 - 110 of 515
Shafer v. Morgan Stanley, et al
as 1:2020cv11047
Defendant:
Morgan Stanley,, John/Jane Does, Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew T Shafer
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Cunningham v. On Deck Capital, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv10621
Defendant:
On Deck Capital, Inc., Enova International Inc. and John/Jane Does 1-5
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cunningham v. Big Think Capital, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv10623
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Defendant:
Big Think Capital, Inc., Dan Israel and John/Jane Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wood v. De Blasio et al
as 1:2020cv10541
Defendant:
NYPD MOS John/Jane Doe, Chief of Department Terence Monahan, CITY OF NEW YORK and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Henry Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schottenstein v. American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA) et al
as 1:2020cv09961
Defendant:
Blue Pearl Operations LLC, American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA), CITY OF NEW YORK and others
Plaintiff:
Dr. Douglas Schottenstein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Matzell v. Annucci et al
as 1:2020cv09963
Defendant:
Elizabeth Laramay, Jane Boyea, Jeffrey McKoy and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Matzell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corey v. Broome County Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2020cv09731
Defendant:
David Harden, Mark Smloinsky, Broome County Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce R. Corey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dupigny v. John/Jane Doe
as 1:2020cv09359
Plaintiff:
Hubert Dupigny
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Genao v. City of New York et al
as 1:2020cv08722
Plaintiff:
Gabino Genao
Defendant:
City of New York, Stukes, MDC Deputy of Secuty Shannon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosa v. Doe
as 1:2020cv07799
Plaintiff:
Juan Rosa
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
