Cases 11 - 20 of 4,669
Benjamin v. RMSC Warden (John Doe) et al
as 1:2024cv04098
Plaintiff:
Heaven Benjamin
Defendant:
RMSC Warden (John Doe) and RMSC Grievance Worker (Jane Doe)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calderon v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv03991
Plaintiff:
Samantha Calderon
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe and Munaplity/Coperate Quo/8.30g
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Montes v. Miller et al
as 1:2024cv04141
Plaintiff:
Germaine Montes
Defendant:
Superintendent Mark Miller, Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03982
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gonzalez v. New York City Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv03859
Plaintiff:
Ricky Gonzalez
Defendant:
New York City Department of Corrections, Correctional Officer John June, Correctional Officer John Randazzo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jaime v. Doe
as 1:2024cv03824
Plaintiff:
Luis Jaime
Defendant:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv03758
Plaintiff:
Robert Murray
Defendant:
City of New York, Dept. Hamuton, C.O. Philogene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03860
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Patterson v. Orange County et al
as 7:2024cv03554
Plaintiff:
Franeisha Patterson
Defendant:
Orange County, ORANGE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE, ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Banshu v. Haggler et al
as 1:2024cv03524
Plaintiff:
Kahusia J. Banshu
Defendant:
Sholomo S. Haggler, James Edward D'Auguste, Denis Michael Reo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
