Cases 11 - 20 of 124
Komatsu v. Urban Pathways, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv09080
Plaintiff:
Towaki Komatsu
Defendant:
Urban Pathways, Inc., Daniels Norelli Cecere & Travel PC, Neighborhood Association for Inter-Cultural Affairs, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv07578
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Rider et al v. Uphold HQ Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01602
Plaintiff:
Theodore Rider, Jesse W. Smith, Gilles Boevi and others
Defendant:
Uphold HQ Inc., John Does, John Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 t Diversity-Torts
Jean-Gilles v. Paragon Systems, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01363
Plaintiff:
Andre Jean-Gilles
Defendant:
Paragon Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Aybar-Alcantara v. Fan et al
as 7:2022cv01060
Plaintiff:
Jose Aybar-Alcantara
Defendant:
Liming Fan, Daniel Gilles Leblanc and Ditech Paint Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 au Diversity-Auto Negligence
El Bey v. Dogdig et al
as 1:2022cv00091
Plaintiff:
Jakim El Bey
Defendant:
Victor G. Dogdig, Lucy Borzelino, Eva Lake and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Diaz v. The Defendants et al
as 1:2021cv08595
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Diaz
Defendant:
The Defendants, Arlene Goldberg, Vance R. Cyrus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gill v. Capstead Mortgage Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv07973
Plaintiff:
Randy Gill
Defendant:
Capstead Mortgage Corporation, Pat Augustine, Jack E. Biegler and others
Ryan v. Strongbridge Biopharma plc et al
as 1:2021cv07256
Plaintiff:
John Ryan
Defendant:
Strongbridge Biopharma plc, John H. Johnson, Garheng Kong and others
Whitfield v. Strongbridge Biopharma plc et al
as 1:2021cv07242
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitfield
Defendant:
Strongbridge Biopharma plc, Garheng Kong, David Gill and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
