Cases 41 - 50 of 547
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv08184
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 IDEA: Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (short title)
Washington et al v. Rivas-Ramos
as 1:2022cv07482
Plaintiff:
SHAQUANA WASHINGTON and ROBERT ADAMS
Defendant:
PEDRO RIVAS-RAMOS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Komatsu v. Ramos
as 1:2022cv06076
Plaintiff:
Towaki Komatsu
Defendant:
Edgardo Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
loanDepot.com, LLC v. CrossCountry Mortgage, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv05971
Plaintiff:
loanDepot.com, LLC
Defendant:
CrossCountry Mortgage, LLC, Keisha Antoine, Scott Bonora and others
Ramos v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2022cv05866
Plaintiff:
Ashly Ramos
Defendant:
City Of New York, Arhenis Lopezestevez and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ramos v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv05695
Plaintiff:
Cruz Manuel Ramos and FNU LNU
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ramos v. Amazing Deal of Grand, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv04746
Plaintiff:
Ramon Martinez Ramos
Defendant:
Amazing Deal of Grand, Inc. doing business as 99 Cents Plaza and Jian Ren Chen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Ramos v. Department of Homeless Services et al
as 1:2022cv03959
Plaintiff:
Jose Antonio Ramos
Defendant:
Department of Homeless Services, Breaking Ground and City Of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03409
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ramos de Almeida v. The City Of New York et al
as 1:2022cv02792
Plaintiff:
Adelia Ramos de Almeida
Defendant:
The City Of New York, David Freund, Jonathan Guillen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
