Cases 51 - 60 of 101
Dixon v. The United States of America et al
as 1:2015cv08414
Plaintiff:
Echo Westley Dixon
Defendant:
The United States of America, The City of New York, New York City Police Department Precinct 44 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv08227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Espinal v. Vaughn, et al
as 1:2015cv06232
Plaintiff:
Maria A Espinal
Defendant:
Anthony Vaughn , Blade Trucking Inc. and TEV Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv05766
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Vaughns v. Gilbert et al
as 1:2015cv05112
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Vaughns
Defendant:
David Gilbert and City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Escort v. Princeton Information LTD et al
as 7:2015cv04487
Plaintiff:
Hope Escort , Aseel Younis , LaVerne Rivera and others
Defendant:
Princeton Information LTD , Citigroup Inc , Citibank, NA (Owner) and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Kirkeminde et al v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
as 7:2015cv01778
Plaintiff:
Katherine E. Kirkeminde and Justin Vaughn Harris
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Al Dey v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv00289
Plaintiff:
Oliver-Vaughn Al Dey and Shanise Farrar
Defendant:
The City of New York, John Doe, Raymond Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2014cv10297
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Marshall v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv08644
Plaintiff:
Kerry L. Marshall
Defendant:
City of New York, Sarah Vaughn-Sams, Gregory Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
