Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Stora v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv03165
Plaintiff:
Skiboky Stora
Defendant:
The City of New York, Detective Gene Ruda, Detective Redmond Halpern and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Welk et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2023cv02681
Plaintiff:
Marvin Welk, Carlos Campos, Kenneth Jackson and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Moore et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2023cv00932
Plaintiff:
Josh Moore, Tom Maestas, William Edward Robertson and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Ruane Cunniff & Goldfarb, Inc. v. Payne et al
as 1:2019cv11297
Nominal Defendant:
Deborah A. Smith, DST Systems, Inc., Myrl C. Jeffcoat and others
Plaintiff:
Ruane Cuniff & Goldfarb, Inc. and Ruane Cunniff & Goldfarb, Inc.
Defendant:
Percy Payne, Brenda Keeton, Kathleen Moerschel and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
Lugo et al v. Carpenter et al
as 1:2016cv00456
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Lugo and Darlene Rodriguez
Defendant:
William Edward Carpenter and Hazekamp Transportation, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
Crowley Jr. v. Colvin
as 1:2013cv01723
Plaintiff:
William Edward Crowley Jr.
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Rev. of Final Dec. of Sec. of HEW re: S.S. Benefits
Edwards v. Horn et al
as 1:2010cv06194
Plaintiff:
William Edwards
Defendant:
Martin F. Horn, Riordan, F. Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Silverman Partners, LP v. The Verox Group et al
as 1:2008cv03103
Plaintiff:
Silverman Partners, LP
Defendant:
The Verox Group, Kenneth Howlett and William Edwards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
