Cases 21 - 30 of 59
Lee v. Doe et al
as 6:2020cv06176
Defendant:
Sergeant Edwards, Captain D. Gleason, Investigator John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Kareem Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant v. Monroe County et al
as 6:2019cv06474
Defendant:
City of Rochester District Attorney's Office, Patrick Carmody, City of Rochester and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dawson v. Doe et al
as 6:2019cv06371
Plaintiff:
Lavon Dawson
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Ludtka, et al
as 1:2019cv00634
Defendant:
J. Ludtka, John Doe, John/Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Dezhean Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Helmer v. Sticht et al
as 1:2018cv01202
Plaintiff:
Clarence Helmer
Defendant:
Thomas J. Sticht, John/Jane Doe Nurses, The People of the State and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. New York State et al
as 6:2018cv06658
Defendant:
Corrections Officer John Crance, New York State, John/Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Carey Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Mahmoud v. Akima Global Services, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00485
Defendant:
Akima Global Services, LLC, Akima Logistics Services, LLC, Michael T. Phillips and others
Plaintiff:
Munther Mahmoud
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruggiero v. Chappius et al
as 1:2017cv01197
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ruggiero
Defendant:
P. Chappius, Jr., P. Piccolo, Melendez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Administration, John Jane Doe et al
as 6:2017cv06665
Plaintiff:
Keith Robinson
Defendant:
Administration, John Jane Doe, Director of Medical Staff, John, Jane Doe, Supervising Security Staff, John, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wehling v. The Village of Medina, et al
as 1:2016cv00746
Plaintiff:
Justin Wehling
Defendant:
The Village of Medina , P.O. Joseph Frentz , P.O. Edwin Bower and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
