Cases 1 - 10 of 679
Garland v. Yeaw et al
as 1:2024cv00438
Plaintiff:
Ms. Kimberly R. Garland
Defendant:
Michael J. Yeaw, Rose H. Chiauzzi, Keri Witherow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Coleman v. Wolcott et al
as 6:2024cv06182
Plaintiff:
Windsor Coleman
Defendant:
Wolcott, Tomprowski and John Doe/Mr. H
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
James v. Martuscello et al
as 1:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Jesse James
Defendant:
Daniel Martuscello, III, Anthony Annucci, Letitia James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monroe v. U.P.M.C. E.R. Attending Staff
as 1:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Grant H. Monroe
Defendant:
U.P.M.C. E.R. Attending Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. New York State et al
as 6:2023cv06703
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Yvonne Walker
Defendant:
New York State and H&R Block
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holder v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2023cv06696
Plaintiff:
William H Holder
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Battle v. Noeth
as 6:2023cv06600
Petitioner:
Shaquill Battle
Respondent:
Acting Warden Joseph H. Noeth and Joseph H. Noeth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv06509
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Young v. Kean, et al
as 1:2023cv00800
Plaintiff:
Tyshawn L. Young d/b/a Tyshawn Young
Defendant:
Lynn Wessel Kean, Lakeema Ithna-Asheri, Amy Terrose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
