Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Miller v. Racism Bilingual Men et al
as 6:2024cv06380
Plaintiff:
Timothy Miller
Defendant:
Racism Bilingual Men, Rochester Works, Clients and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wrighter v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Clinton L. Wrighter
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lang v. Clinton et al
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Jason William Lang
Defendant:
Hillary Rodham Clinton, Andrew Mark Cuomo, Barack Hussein Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Aguirre v. Doe #1 et al
as 1:2023cv01240
Plaintiff:
Jairo Aguirre
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2, Joey Clinton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole v. Clinton
as 6:2023cv06667
Petitioner:
John W. Cole
Respondent:
J. Clinton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dooley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv01056
Plaintiff:
James Clinton Dooley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Whitaker v. Brown
as 1:2023cv00669
Plaintiff:
Ramona Pando Whitaker
Defendant:
Clinton E. Brown and Clinton Brown
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Smithers v. Dennis et al
as 6:2023cv06360
Plaintiff:
Boice F. Smithers, Jr.
Defendant:
Brian Dennis, Hillary R. Clinton, David M. Hardy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruggiero v. Rogers et al
as 1:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ruggiero
Defendant:
Donald D. Rogers, Mark E. Carrow, Joseph H. Noeth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Montagari
as 6:2022cv06432
Petitioner:
Clinton Jackson
Respondent:
A. Montagari
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
