Cases 101 - 110 of 177
Lichtenwalter et al v. Maier
as 5:2014cv00218
Plaintiff:
Derek Lichtenwalter, Michael Ernest Williams, Courtney Marshall and others
Defendant:
George Maier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prade v. City of Akron, et al
as 5:2014cv00188
Plaintiff:
Douglas Prade
Defendant:
City of Akron, Mary Myers, Ed Duvall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Hochul et al
as 4:2014cv00162
Plaintiff:
Brian Avery Smith
Defendant:
William J. Hochul, Jr., Maura K. O'Donnell, Richard Callahan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. Cadden et al
as 3:2014cv00005
Plaintiff:
Troy Marshall
Defendant:
Barry J. Cadden, Gregory Conigliaro, Lisa Conigliaro Cadden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Banks v. CCA Corporate Office et al
as 4:2013cv02721
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
CCA Corporate Office, Michael Pugh, CCA NEOCC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Zickefoose et al
as 4:2013cv02715
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Gary Zickefoose, Michael Pugh, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Pugh et al
as 4:2013cv02522
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Michael Pugh, J. Headley, United States Marshal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Pugh et al
as 4:2013cv02439
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Michael Pugh, United States Probation Office, Western District of Pennsylvania and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall, Sr. v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2013dp21250
Plaintiff:
Thermond Marshall, Sr.
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jimenez v. United States of America, Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2013cv02198
Plaintiff:
Richard Jimenez
Defendant:
United States of America, Bureau of Prisons, Unknown Nurse, FTC Oklahoma, Unknown Doctor, FTC Oklahoma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
