Cases 31 - 40 of 2,108
Currie v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65090
Plaintiff:
Jeanette E. Currie
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Philpott v. City of Stow et al.
as 5:2024cv00580
Plaintiff:
Michael Philpott
Defendant:
City of Stow, Stephan W. Miller, Samantha R. Wike and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Doe et al.
as 1:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Banks, III
Defendant:
Scott John Doe, Jane Doe Williams and Jane Doe Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lynn v. Beers et al
as 5:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Vicki Lynn
Defendant:
Daniel J. Beers, Ronald Beers, Daniel Beers, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Beasley v. USAA General Indemnity Company
as 3:2024cv00511
Plaintiff:
Clifton E. Beasley
Defendant:
USAA General Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Campbell v. Cordova
as 5:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Kelsey E. Campbell
Defendant:
Judge Michelle L. Cordova
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Davena E. James
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Wright v. City of Akron et al.
as 5:2024cv00332
Plaintiff:
Michelle S. Wright
Defendant:
City of Akron, Magistrate Mary Ann Mendlick, Leah Sewell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
E. Mishan & Sons, Inc. v. Mark Feldstein & Associates, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
E. Mishan & Sons, Inc.
Defendant:
Mark Feldstein & Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
