Cases 41 - 50 of 363
Rhodes et al v. Rhodes Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2020op45076
Defendant:
Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc., Beverly Sackler, Allergan Sales, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Silvers, Lea Anne Spradlen and Roger Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Okfuskee County Board of County Commissioners v. Purdue Pharma, LP et al
as 1:2020op45005
Defendant:
Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc., McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Okfuskee County Board of County Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00019
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Barbour et al v. Peoples Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv02816
Plaintiff:
Roger Barbour and Felicia Barbour
Defendant:
Total Distribution, Inc., Peoples Cartage, Inc. and Peoples Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perry v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2019dp20081
Defendant:
DePuy Inc., DePuy International Limited, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Roger M. Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rogers v. LE Energy, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv02153
Defendant:
John Doe Corporation and LE Energy, LLC
Plaintiff:
Jayson Rogers
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Holmes v. Chandler Murphy Swanson
as 1:2019cv02171
Plaintiff:
Roger Lee Holmes
Defendant:
Chandler Murphy Swanson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv02058
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Clay v. Weidner et al
as 1:2019cv01916
Defendant:
Scott Basquin, Charles Moore, McKalee Weidner and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Clay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Sure Conveyors, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv01732
Defendant:
Sure Conveyors, Inc., A1 AG Services, LLC., Todd Showner and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
