Cases 1 - 10 of 71
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00958
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Riley v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65454
Plaintiff:
Troy S Riley
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Bolinger et al.
as 5:2024cv00784
Plaintiff:
DeAerre Smith and Smurk
Defendant:
Joshua Bolinger, Deputy McCutcheon, Becky McCutcheon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Bolinger et al.
as 5:2024cv00787
Plaintiff:
DeAerre Smith and Smurk
Defendant:
Joshua Bolinger, Deputy McCutcheon, Becky McCutcheon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Riley v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
Melissa Riley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Davison v. City of Lorain et al.
as 1:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Andrew J. Davison
Defendant:
City of Lorain, Cielo Rodriguez, Mallory Santiago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. University Hospitals et al.
as 1:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Justin Hughes
Defendant:
University Hospitals, Governor Mike DeWine, Dr. Anupam Jha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Riley v. Timiny R/R Constructions, Inc.
as 3:2021cv02288
Plaintiff:
Aaron Riley
Defendant:
Timiny R/R Constructions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv02046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
McFarland v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2021cv01225
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Adminstration
Plaintiff:
Riley McFarland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
