Cases 1 - 10 of 116
Garlick v. Cleveland Door Controls, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00920
Plaintiff:
Kyle Garlick
Defendant:
Cleveland Door Controls, Inc.
Beauregard v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65621
Plaintiff:
Kyle Beauregard
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pericoloso v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65517
Plaintiff:
Kyle V Pericoloso
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Davis v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65462
Plaintiff:
Kyle T Davis
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00827
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Arnold v. Hauswirth et al.
as 4:2024cv00312
Plaintiff:
Ralph Arnold
Defendant:
Kyle A. Hauswirth, Karrie Hupka, Unit Manager Joe Remish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Piatt v. May
as 3:2024cv00096
Petitioner:
Kyle C. Piatt
Respondent:
Warden Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kaseda v. Village of Fairport Harbor et al.
as 1:2023cv02031
Plaintiff:
Brian Kaseda
Defendant:
City of Fairport Harbor, Fairport Harbor Police Department, Mayor Tim Manross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barringer v. State of Ohio
as 3:2023cv01530
Plaintiff:
Kyle Barringer
Defendant:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Smith v. Haddadin et al
as 5:2023cv01171
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith
Defendant:
Zeid Haddadin, Kyle Trsinar, Emmalee Carver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
