Cases 1 - 10 of 89
Murray v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00639
Plaintiff:
Constance Murray
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Murray v. Indivior Inc et al
as 1:2024sf65037
Defendant:
Aquestive Therapeutics Inc., Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC and others
Plaintiff:
Krystal Murray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lane v. Dolman et al.
as 5:2023cv02138
Plaintiff:
William Lane
Defendant:
Deputy Steven Dolman, Deputy Russ, Deputy Dale Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Murray
as 5:2022cv01329
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Robert L. Murray, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Fulgham v. DuPuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2021dp20015
Plaintiff:
Murray G. Fulgham
Defendant:
DuPuy Orthopaedics, Inc., DePuy, Inc., DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bartole v. Beverly, et al
as 1:2021cv01724
Plaintiff:
Gustavo Bartole
Defendant:
William Cread Beverly and W. Christopher Murray, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Westley v. Harris et al
as 4:2021cv01672
Plaintiff:
James Westley
Defendant:
Warden Brandeshawn Harris, Warden LaShann Eppinger, Michael Beebe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murray v. Thomas, et al
as 1:2021cv01200
Defendant:
John Does 1-10, City of Warrensville Heighs, Officer Jerome Thomas and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Murray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00829
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
