Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00369
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Kenney et al v. City Of Cincinnati et al
as 1:2022cv00295
Plaintiff:
Maurice Kenney, Quinn Moore, Mary Zeiser and others
Defendant:
City Of Cincinnati, Mayor John Cranley, City Manager Patrick Duhaney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rohrig v. Grant
as 2:2021cv01843
Plaintiff:
Kyle Rohrig
Defendant:
Neil Grant, Amy Meyers and Officer Neil Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Koren v. Neil et al
as 1:2021cv00009
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe(s) 1-2, Matthew Collini, Laura Ray and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Koren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Jrafto Antio Parker David Alexander Muina v. The St. Joe Real Estate Co. 133 South Water Sound Water Sound Florida 32413 et al
as 1:2020cv00122
Defendant:
The St. Joe Real Estate Co. 133 South Water Sound Water Sound Florida 32413, Thomas Hoyer, Asssitant D.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Jrafto Antio Parker David Alexander Muina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Roth v. Neil
as 1:2020cv00054
Defendant:
JIM NEIL
Plaintiff:
THOMAS L. ROTH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Hamilton County, Ohio/Hamilton County Prosecutor's Office et al
as 1:2019cv00969
Defendant:
Carla Dreyer, Court Clinic/Central Clinic & Carla Dreyer, Matthew Matin and others
Plaintiff:
Terry Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howell v. NaphCare, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00373
Plaintiff:
Karla Howell
Defendant:
Matthew Collini, NaphCare, Inc., Pierette Arthur and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01999
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Perdue v. Jim Neil et al
as 1:2019cv00146
Defendant:
Hamilton County, Ohio, Jim Neil, Sheriff of Hamilton County and Jim Neil
Plaintiff:
Brittany Perdue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
