Cases 11 - 20 of 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Copeland v. Kelly et al
as 1:2022cv00129
Plaintiff:
Dinell Maurice Copeland
Defendant:
Brendan Kelly and Butler County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01196
Plaintiff:
Maurice Douglas Smith
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Roach v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv04252
Plaintiff:
MAURICE ROACH
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hemmelgarn et al v. Banner et al
as 3:2021cv00163
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance, KLLM Transportation Services, LLC and Nickeynon Maurice Banner
Plaintiff:
Beth Hemmelgarn and Scott A Hemmelgarn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Craig v. Hamilton County Sheriff et al
as 1:2021cv00115
Plaintiff:
Maurice Craig
Defendant:
Hamilton County Sheriff, Forest Park Police Department, Hamilton County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
McShan v. Jefferson County et al
as 2:2020cv05898
Plaintiff:
Joseph McShan
Defendant:
Kenneth Richardson, Maurice Tucker, Jefferson County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickstein v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv05623
Plaintiff:
Maurice Dickstein
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Betts v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00516
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Maurice Betts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jarrell v. Army Review Boards Agency et al
as 3:2019cv00349
Defendant:
Army Review Boards Agency, United States Attorney, National Personnel Records Center and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Maurice Jarrell
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
