Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Geer v. Ginocchio et al
as 1:2017cv00214
Plaintiff:
Douglas Geer
Defendant:
Jacqueline Ginocchio, Price Hill Police Dept Dis #3, John Dotson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Franklin County Prosecutor's Office et al
as 2:2016cv01173
Plaintiff:
Pierre Hamilton
Defendant:
Franklin County Prosecutor's Office, City of Columbus Police Dept. and State Of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holbrook v. Pols et al
as 1:2016cv01013
Plaintiff:
Charles Holbrook
Defendant:
Tim Pols, Wyoming Police Dept and Wyoming, MI City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Readnour v. Berry et al
as 1:2015cv00003
Plaintiff:
Jack Readnour
Defendant:
Ted Berry, Nadine Allen, Phillip Stevens and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Wheeler v. Dayton Police Dept. et al
as 3:2013cv00290
Plaintiff:
Eric D. Wheeler
Defendant:
Dayton Police Dept., Michael L. Skidmore , Hurley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hurt v. D.C. Government, et al.
as 1:2013cv00433
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hurt
Defendant:
D.C. Government, Corporation Council Office and D.C. Metropolitan Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hurt v. D.C. Metropolitan Police Dept.
as 1:2013cv00431
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hurt
Defendant:
D.C. Metropolitan Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Rice v. Franklin County and Franklin County Board of Commissioners et al
as 2:2012cv01205
Plaintiff:
Dell Rice
Defendant:
Franklin County and Franklin County Board of Commissioners , Franklin County Sheriff's Office , C. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peters v. Dayton Police Dept Secured Lot for Storage
as 3:2011cv00336
Plaintiff:
John Peters, III
Defendant:
Dayton Police Dept Secured Lot for Storage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bach v. Drerup et al
as 3:2011cv00317
Plaintiff:
Terry Bach
Defendant:
Scott Drerup, Paul Markowski, John/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
