Cases 31 - 40 of 122
Coleman et al v. Allegheny County, PA, PFA Unit et al
as 2:2021cv02103
Defendant:
Allegheny County, PA, PFA Unit, Franklin County Sheriff's Dept. (FCSD), Shanekqua Coates and others
Plaintiff:
Minister Norman V. Whiteside and Pastor Rosanna L. Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Abbott Laboratories et al
as 1:2020cv00855
Defendant:
The Procter & Gamble Distributing LLC, Abbott Laboratories, Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Dawn Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coleman v. Franklin County, Ohio, et al
as 2:2020cv05544
Defendant:
FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO and Franklin County Court of Common Pleas
Plaintiff:
Marlo Coleman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Coleman v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv03706
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ronald E Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coleman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2020cv00155
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Carl E. Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Coleman, Jr. v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00279
Plaintiff:
James Coleman, Jr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coleman et al v. Burghy et al
as 2:2020cv00218
Defendant:
Captain Burghy, Officer Cowgill, Officer Sheppard and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Brian Coleman and J'Kuan Maleek Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00049
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
William Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coleman et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00051
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Latissa Coleman and Derick Weaver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coleman v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00020
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Calvin Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
