Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00433
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00204
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Nolan v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2012cv00477
Plaintiff:
Melissa S. Nolan
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
ROGERS v. KERNS et al
as 1:2011cv00698
Plaintiff:
Billy Rogers
Defendant:
KERNS, MORGAN, WARREN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Nolan Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00705
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc. , Warner-Tamerlane Publishing Corp. , Eleksylum Music, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Nolan Enterprises, Inc. and Frederick N. Tegtmeier
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Nolan v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2010cv00988
Plaintiff:
Cindy L. Nolan
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Nolan v. Jenkins et al
as 2:2009cv00942
Plaintiff:
Kathryn L. Nolan
Defendant:
Thomas Jenkins, J. Fisher, M. Whaley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Replogle v. Montgomery County, Ohio et al
as 3:2009cv00102
Plaintiff:
Thomas J Replogle and Thomas J Replogle
Defendant:
Montgomery County, Ohio, Montgomery County, Ohio, Dave Vore and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
General Power Products v. Nolan et al
as 1:2009cv00118
Plaintiff:
General Power Products
Defendant:
Bradley S. Nolan, Bradley S. Nolan, Tufco Flooring Mid-Atlantic Inc and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
