Cases 41 - 50 of 53
Payne et al v. Pummill et al
as 2:2013cv01172
Plaintiff:
Lowell N. Payne, Clifford L. Rucker, James Robinson and others
Defendant:
Cathy Pummill, Jane Doe Park, Amy Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norris v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2013cv00074
Plaintiff:
Martin Norris
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 425 Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Norris v. Ohio
as 1:2012cv00811
Plaintiff:
Gloria E. Norris
Defendant:
State Of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Medmarc Casualty Insurance Company v. Law Offices of Yelsky & Lonardo et al
as 2:2012cv00887
Plaintiff:
Medmarc Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Law Offices of Yelsky & Lonardo, Leonard Yelsky, LaurynMae Yelsky and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Norris v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction
as 3:2011cv00204
Petitioner:
Robert Lee Norris
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norris v. Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Institution
as 1:2010cv00764
Petitioner:
William E. Norris
Respondent:
Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Green v. Norris et al
as 2:2009cv00003
Plaintiff:
Pamala Green
Defendant:
Marty Norris, Steve Willey, Fairfield County and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Norris v. Warden Noble Correctional Institution
as 2:2008cv00732
Petitioner:
Dowell Norris
Respondent:
Warden Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tyrvaldsen v. County of Fairfield Ohio et al
as 2:2008cv00220
Plaintiff:
Ymir-Jule Tyrvaldsen
Defendant:
County of Fairfield Ohio, Rachel Jane Tyrvaldsen, Martin Norris and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
