Cases 61 - 70 of 5,026
Morrison v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02825
Plaintiff:
John Morrison
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WOODLEY SR. v. YOUNG et al
as 2:2024cv01619
Petitioner:
Jamal F. Woodley Sr.
Respondent:
David C Young, John R. Cornely, Larry Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Seid v. O'Grady
as 2:2024cv01480
Plaintiff:
Indrias Seid
Defendant:
Commissioner John O'Grady
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Radel v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02689
Plaintiff:
John Radel
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Casey v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02727
Plaintiff:
John Casey
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wine v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02717
Plaintiff:
John Wine
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Childress et al v. City of Cincinnati, Ohio et al
as 1:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Akil Childress, Emma Sue Long, Charlene Berkhalter and others
Defendant:
City of Cincinnati, Ohio, Jan-Michele Lemon Kearney, Victoria Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alexander v. Davis et al
as 1:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
Jerone Alexander
Defendant:
Cynthia D Davis, Charles O'Connor, N. Brabson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. City of Middletown Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Christopher Robinson
Defendant:
City of Middletown Police Department, John Doe and John Roe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCurdy v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02457
Plaintiff:
John B McCurdy
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
