Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Bowling, Jr. v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02086
Plaintiff:
Harold Bowling, Jr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Densler et al v. The Medical Protective Company Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00216
Plaintiff:
Adm Bethany Densler, Christopher Atwood, Jennifer Hickey and others
Defendant:
The Medical Protective Company Inc., MedPro Group Inc., f/k/a Medical Protective Corporation, Robert Ignasiak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00717
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Dearing v. Rogers et al
as 1:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
Michael Dearing, Jr.
Defendant:
Kimmy Rogers, Logan Collins, Shawn Cooley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bowles et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv06327
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Tim Bowles and Wanda Bowles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Assi v. Hanshaw et al
as 1:2020cv00839
Defendant:
Robert Bowles, John Chapman, Sheriff Jeffery S. Lawless and others
Plaintiff:
Hassan Adran Assi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowles v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02654
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Bobby Bowles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dukes et al v. McClay Transportation USA, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00144
Defendant:
McClay Transportation USA, LLC, Todd Bowling and Todd A. Bowling
Plaintiff:
Megan Dukes and HEATH JENNINGS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Assi v. Williams et al
as 1:2019cv00688
Plaintiff:
Hassan Adran Assi
Defendant:
Col. S Williams, Officer Cochran, Officer Golsby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cole v. Tee Grizzly et al
as 1:2019cv00607
Defendant:
David Bruce Toyota, Tee Grizzly, John Bowling and others
Plaintiff:
Tyshawn M. Cole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
