Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
McGuirk IV et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01978
Plaintiff: CHARLES WILLIAM MCGUIRK IV and SAMANTHA ROSE BAINTER-MCGUIRK
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv04915
Plaintiff: Charles Williams
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Springdale Police Department et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00407
Plaintiff: Charles Williams
Defendant: Springdale Police Department and William Zeek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Addition
as 1:2017cv00408
Plaintiff: Charles Williams
Defendant: Addition
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Harper v. Advanced Global Ventures et al
as 1:2016cv01036
Plaintiff: Charles William Harper, II
Defendant: Advanced Global Ventures, International Travel Organization, William D. LaSelle and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00888
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Williams v. Real Soft Inc We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00889
Plaintiff: Charles Williams
Defendant: Real Soft Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
In re: Charles Williams Winters
as 2:2016mc00009
Respondent: Charles William Winters
Williams v. Chuvalas et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv00033
Plaintiff: Charles Williams
Defendant: Rick Chuvalas and George Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calebaugh v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01009
Plaintiff: Charles William Calebaugh
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?