Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Duffy v. C.R. Bard, Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00511
Plaintiff:
Karen Evette Duffy
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Duffie v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02430
Plaintiff:
Rick Duffie
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Duffy v. Davol. Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00778
Plaintiff:
Daniel P. Duffy
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilson et al v. Rack Seven Paving Co. et al
as 1:2019cv00163
Defendant:
Rack Seven Paving Co., Timothy Rack and Kevin Rack
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wilson, Mark Hammock, Robert Duffy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Newman v. Ohio Civil Rights Commission et al
as 3:2018cv00088
Plaintiff:
Peter K Newman
Defendant:
Ohio Civil Rights Commission , Leonard J. Hubert , Lori Barreras and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Newman v. Ohio Civil Rights Commission et al
as 3:2018cv00089
Plaintiff:
Peter K Newman
Defendant:
Ohio Civil Rights Commission , Leonard J. Hubert , Lori Barreras and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith v. Watson et al
as 2:2017cv00073
Defendant:
Watson, Michael H Watson, Elizabeth P. Deavers and others
Plaintiff:
Smith and Reverend Regina Junior Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Duffie v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2014cv00394
Plaintiff:
Teresa R. Duffie
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Duffy v. O'Brien et al
as 2:2013cv00725
Plaintiff:
Ginger M. Duffy
Defendant:
Kevin J. O'Brien, Carrie Doppes Wolfe, Jonathan M. Layman and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Duffy v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2012cv00057
Plaintiff:
Gary Allen Duffy
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
