Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Fiedler v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02965
Plaintiff:
Herbert Fiedler
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Alford v. Rice et al
as 3:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Alford
Defendant:
Walter Herbert Rice, Jeffrey R McQuiston and Donald R Reidman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herbert v. KC Robotics, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00633
Plaintiff:
Jeff Herbert
Defendant:
KC Robotics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Sturgell v. Paccar, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03922
Plaintiff:
Herbert Sturgell
Defendant:
Paccar, Inc., Group Life and Income Protection Plan for US Salaried Employees of Paccar Inc. and its Participating Subsidiaries and The Hartford Financial Service Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Ryder v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03028
Plaintiff:
Herbert Ryder
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Alderson et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01320
Plaintiff:
HERBERT BRUCE ALDERSON and NANCY LOU ALDERSON
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Herbert v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00360
Plaintiff:
Joseph Herbert
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pugsley v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00355
Plaintiff:
Herbert Pugsley
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gerdau v. Cambridge City Police et al
as 2:2021cv04152
Plaintiff:
Herbert G. Gerdau
Defendant:
Cambridge City Police, Officer Eubanks, Officer James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01847
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
