Cases 1 - 10 of 125
Murphy v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02856
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Murphy
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McCullom v. Newark Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv02806
Plaintiff:
Christopher T. McCullom
Defendant:
Newark Police Department, Officer Alex Colles, Officer Stevens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Murphy v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02826
Plaintiff:
Johellen Murphy
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Murphy et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01670
Plaintiff:
Thomas Murphy and Sydney Murphy
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Henderson v. Mike Dewine et al
as 2:2024cv02006
Interested Party:
State of Ohio
Plaintiff:
Antonio Henderson
Defendant:
Mike Dewine, Amy Acton, Annette Chambers-Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Kettering Adventist Healthcare
as 3:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Amy Murphy
Defendant:
Kettering Adventist Healthcare
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Murphy Road Recycling, LLC v. Cathcart Rail, Inc.
as 2:2023cv03809
Plaintiff:
MURPHY ROAD RECYCLING, LLC
Defendant:
CATHCART RAIL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Smith v. City of Fairfield et al
as 1:2023cv00805
Plaintiff:
Kelly A. Smith
Defendant:
City of Fairfield, Stephen Maynard, Scott Timmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00659
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Murphy v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03796
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Richards Murphy
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
