Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Smith v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01022
Plaintiff: Michael Smith
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04522
Plaintiff: Michael Smith and Esther Smith
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Prows v. City of Oxford et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00693
Plaintiff: Tate Prows and Tate David Prows
Defendant: City of Oxford, Chief John A. Jones, Michael Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. USA
as 3:2022cv00330
Petitioner: Joseph Michael Smith
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Smith et al v. C.R. Bard et al
as 2:2022cv02511
Plaintiff: Michael Smith and Paula Smith
Defendant: C.R. Bard and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sunnydale Farms, LLC et al v. EAP Ohio, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv01298
Plaintiff: James S. Smith, Melissa J. Smith, D. Michael Smith and others
Defendant: Encino Acquisition Partner Holdings, LLC, Siltstone Resources, LLC, EAP Operating, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00867
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff: Michael Smith and Connie Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02642
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff: Michael Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00735
Petitioner: Shawn Michael Smith
Respondent: Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?