Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Evans v. U.S. Marshal Service
as 2:2017cv00424
Petitioner:
William H. Evans, Jr.
Respondent:
U.S. Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
EALY et al v. DLOTT et al
as 3:2015cv00169
Plaintiff:
LANCE Q. ELLIS EALY, Larry E Ealy and SCLG-LLC
Defendant:
SUSAN DLOTT, Michael R Barrett, JEREMY ROSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pina v. United States U.S. Marshals
as 3:2015cv00080
Petitioner:
Demian Pina
Respondent:
United States U.S. Marshals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Logue v. US Marshals et al
as 1:2013cv00348
Plaintiff:
Derek Logue
Defendant:
US Marshals, Hamilton County Sheriff's Office, Hamilton County Sheriff's Office Deputy with Badge #153 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Price v. Jones, Sheriff et al
as 1:2012cv00360
Plaintiff:
Landon M. Price
Defendant:
Richard K. Jones, Sheriff, Bunnel, Lt and Unknown U.S. Marshal, Cincinnati
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pendleton v. United States District Court for the Southern District Ohio Eastern Division et al
as 2:2009cv00028
Plaintiff:
Sammy Lee Pendleton
Defendant:
United States District Court for the Southern District Ohio Eastern Division, James L. Graham, U.S. Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ohio/Oklahoma Hearst-Argyle Television, Inc. v. U.S. Marshals Service et al
as 1:2008cv00663
Plaintiff:
Ohio/Oklahoma Hearst-Argyle Television, Inc. and Ohio/Oklahoma Hearst-Argyle Television, Inc.
Defendant:
U.S. Marshals Service and U.S. Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Stewart v. Franklin County Children Services et al
as 2:2008cv00124
Plaintiff:
Sheila Stewart
Defendant:
Franklin County Children Services, Franklin County Sheriff's Department, Columbus City Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
