Cases 61 - 70 of 827,656
Groves v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02788
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Groves
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hertzog v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02793
Plaintiff:
Janette Hertzog
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hoppe v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02796
Plaintiff:
Tina Hoppe
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02816
Plaintiff:
Keith Johnson
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones, Jr. v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02820
Plaintiff:
Dana Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Meeks v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02824
Plaintiff:
Wesley Meeks
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Armstrong v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02783
Plaintiff:
Elaine Armstrong
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CARR et al v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv02184
Plaintiff:
MARGARET CARR and Tim Carr
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, INC., WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, WAL-MART REAL ESTATE BUSINESS TRUST and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Muir et al v. R82, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv02191
Plaintiff:
Robert Muir and Jill Muir
Defendant:
R82, INC., ETAC, NATIONAL SEATING AND MOBILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GALLMAN v. IRWIN et al
as 1:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
BRIAN GALLMAN
Defendant:
R. IRIWIN, S. SCHAFFER, CHAPLAIN AYARS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
