Cases 61 - 70 of 385
Thompson v. Mericle et al
as 6:2021cv00358
Plaintiff:
Tyler Cole Thompson
Defendant:
Matthew Mericle, John Doe and Ada, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clervrain et al v. Garland et al
as 6:2021cv00326
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Francis Cobbina Osei-Fosu
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, John M. O'Connor, Paul B. Hunker, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
W.C. Chapman, LP v. Cavazos
as 6:2021cv00320
Plaintiff:
W.C. Chapman, LP
Defendant:
John Cavazos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hurst v. Crow
as 6:2021cv00308
Petitioner:
Shaun Lovell Franklin Hurst
Respondent:
Scott Crow, Mark Bowen and John O'Connor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fontenot v. Ada, City of et al
as 6:2021cv00249
Plaintiff:
Karl Fontenot
Defendant:
Ada, City of, Mike Baskin, John Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LeBlue et al v. Six Unknown U.S. Marshals Service Agents et al
as 6:2021cv00218
Plaintiff:
Geoheidi LeBlue, Estate of Corben Hunter Jones and George Myron Cardinal
Defendant:
Six Unknown U.S. Marshals Service Agents, Darryl LaCounte, Eddy Rice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brauning v. Christian et al
as 6:2021cv00199
Plaintiff:
Jacob Wayne Brauning
Defendant:
John Gilbert Christian, Charles Steven Kessinger, Lori Lynn Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barton et al v. Markel American Insurance Company et al
as 6:2021cv00132
Defendant:
John Benefield and Markel American Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Hazel Barton and Bill Barton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Webster et al v. Garland et al
as 6:2021cv00119
Plaintiff:
Paul Leroy Wickham, Dwayne Marvin Garrett and Shirley Dione Webster
Defendant:
Jim Felte, Christopher Wray, Claire V. Eagan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horrell v. Chennault et al
as 6:2021cv00096
Defendant:
Does 1-5, John Doe and Jason Chennault
Plaintiff:
Michael Horrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
