Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. P & S Entertainment, LLC et al
as 6:2023cv00030
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
P & S Entertainment, LLC doing business as The Office: Not Your Typical 9-5, Jon Pierce, Khristen Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Unauthorized Publication or Use of Communications
State Farm Life Insurance Company v. Drake et al
as 6:2021cv00328
Plaintiff:
State Farm Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
David J. Drake, Michelle Pierce, Daniel T. Tillinghast and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv00184
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Davis et al v. Morgan et al
as 6:2021cv00029
Defendant:
Shirley Dionne Garrett Webster, R. D. Mead, M. G. McCaslin and others
Plaintiff:
Lindsey R. Davis and Jared L. Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pierce v. Williams et al
as 6:2020cv00284
Respondent:
John Lilley Correctional Center, FNU Shields, FNU Anderson and others
Petitioner:
Mark Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brister et al v. Bossen et al
as 6:2019cv00210
Defendant:
Vanessa Pierce Plunkett, RGB Eye Associates, PA, P&B Eye Investments, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
James L. Brister and Kathy L. Brister
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pierce v. Byrd
as 6:2017cv00213
Petitioner:
Gregory Therman Pierce
Respondent:
Robert Byrd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pierce v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2017cv00025
Plaintiff:
Sammy D. Pierce
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Pierce v. McCollum
as 6:2016cv00217
Petitioner:
Carlton R. Pierce
Respondent:
Tracy McCollum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pierce v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2016cv00092
Plaintiff:
Patricia S. Pierce
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
