Cases 1 - 10 of 82
Fournerat v. Reed Smith LLP et al
as 6:2022cv00315
Plaintiff:
Wayne M Fournerat
Defendant:
Reed Smith LLP, Reed Smith LLC, Tamara Box and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
King v. Bridges
as 6:2022cv00288
Petitioner:
Rodney King
Respondent:
Scott Crow, John O'Connell and Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hudson v. Bridges
as 6:2022cv00290
Petitioner:
James P. Hudson
Respondent:
Scott Crow, John O'Connell and Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Rankins
as 6:2022cv00242
Petitioner:
Alan Stuart Taylor
Respondent:
Chris Rankins and Scott D. Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Crow
as 6:2022cv00218
Petitioner:
Leslie Kevin Johnson
Respondent:
D.C. Cole and Scott D. Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phillips v. Crow
as 6:2022cv00175
Petitioner:
Thomas Raymond Phillips, III
Respondent:
United States of America and Scott D. Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Winston, J.R. v. Crow
as 6:2022cv00133
Petitioner:
Leon Mar'Kel Winston, J.R. and Leon Mar'Kel Winston, Jr
Respondent:
Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Snow v. Nunn
as 6:2022cv00129
Petitioner:
Allen Snow
Respondent:
Scott Crow, John O'Connell and Scott Nunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen v. Crow
as 6:2022cv00125
Petitioner:
Michael Wayne Allen
Respondent:
Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lawton v. Nunn
as 6:2022cv00086
Petitioner:
Theodoric B. Lawton
Respondent:
Scott Crow, John O'Connell and Scott Nunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.