Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Hurst v. Harpe et al
as 6:2024cv00209
Petitioner:
Shaun Lovell Franklin Hurst
Defendant:
Steven Harpe, Rick Williams and Gentner Drummond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Franklin v. Shue
as 6:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Michael Locke Franklin
Defendant:
Charles Daniel Shue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Franklin v. Bryant et al
as 6:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
Jason Javon Franklin
Defendant:
Chris Bryant, Carter County Detention Center, Devra Atwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin v. Bryant et al
as 6:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Jason Javon Franklin
Defendant:
Chris Bryant, Devra Atwood, Landon Gary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole v. United States of America
as 6:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Franklin Cole
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00337
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Buckner v. Sallisaw, City of et al
as 6:2022cv00146
Plaintiff:
William Sean Buckner
Defendant:
Sallisaw, City of, Houston Murray and Terry Franklin
Interested Party:
CSS DHS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Franklin v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2022cv00049
Plaintiff:
Angela Jean Franklin
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hurst v. Crow
as 6:2021cv00308
Petitioner:
Shaun Lovell Franklin Hurst
Respondent:
Scott Crow, Mark Bowen and John O'Connor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LeBlue et al v. Six Unknown U.S. Marshals Service Agents et al
as 6:2021cv00218
Plaintiff:
Geoheidi LeBlue, Estate of Corben Hunter Jones and George Myron Cardinal
Defendant:
Six Unknown U.S. Marshals Service Agents, Darryl LaCounte, Eddy Rice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
