Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Kane v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 6:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Tammy Kane
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP doing business as Walmart Store #374
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Harris v. Edwards et al
as 6:2022cv00310
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Harris
Defendant:
Donnie Edwards, Leflore County Detention Center Public Trust, Jessica Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Neely Bates v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2022cv00233
Plaintiff:
Tammy R Neely Bates and Tammy R. Neely Bates
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Clervrain et al v. Treat et al
as 6:2021cv00365
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Francis Cobbina Osei-Fosu
Defendant:
Geg Treat, Greg McCortney, James Leewright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gammon v. C.R. Bard, Incorporated et al
as 6:2021cv00064
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Tammy Lynn Gammon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Andujar-Johnson v. Singh et al
as 6:2020cv00102
Plaintiff:
Tammy Andujar-Johnson
Defendant:
A Gill Trucking, LLC, Ramnpreet Singh, FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Webb v. Cotton et al
as 6:2019cv00330
Defendant:
Tammy Cotton, Micky J. Hadwigger, Mark Keller and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher John Webb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Medley v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2019cv00230
Plaintiff:
Tammy L. Medley
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Blair v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2018cv00269
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Tammy E. Blair
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
