Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Lay v. Quick
as 6:2023cv00326
Petitioner:
Wade Lay
Respondent:
Christie Quick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watkins et al v. Housing Authority of the City of Hugo, The et al
as 6:2023cv00178
Plaintiff:
Ronesha Watkins and Ronesha Waktins
Defendant:
Housing Authority of the City of Hugo, The, Wade Awtry, Grasiela Starlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Johnson v. Walgreens et al
as 6:2022cv00087
Plaintiff:
Clarence D. Johnson and Nehemiah H&G Construction
Defendant:
Walgreens, CVS, Rite-Aid and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Tabor v. Air Evac EMS, Inc.
as 6:2021cv00362
Plaintiff:
Teddy Wade Tabor
Defendant:
Air Evac EMS, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lay v. American Civil Liberties Union of Oklahoma et al
as 6:2021cv00214
Petitioner:
Wade Lay
Respondent:
American Civil Liberties Union of Oklahoma, Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Scott Crow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farley et al v. Wade et al
as 6:2021cv00047
Defendant:
Ben Wade and EAN Holdings, LLC doing business as Enterprise Rent-A-Car
Plaintiff:
David Farley and Penny Farley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv00015
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Thomas v. Allbaugh et al
as 6:2020cv00198
Respondent:
Casey Briscoe, Mr. Lopez, David Metz and others
Plaintiff:
Robert James Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Cronister et al
as 6:2019cv00058
Defendant:
John Doe #2, Cronister and John Doe #1
Plaintiff:
Joshua Wade Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maxey v. Marti
as 6:2019cv00017
Plaintiff:
Robert Wade Maxey
Defendant:
Matthew McCoy Marti and Employers Mutual Casualty Company
Intervenor:
CompSource Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
