Cases 61 - 70 of 93
Walton v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2021cv00550
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Walton
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, Northeastern Oklahoma Correctional Center, Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coker v. Regalado et al
as 4:2021cv00516
Plaintiff:
Sandra Coker
Defendant:
Vic Regalado, Olakule Babarinde, Brandon Blish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chrisco v. Unit Guard #1 et al
as 4:2021cv00467
Plaintiff:
Luke Irvin and Luke Irvin Chrisco
Defendant:
Unit Guard #1, Unit Guard #2 and J Pendergraft
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. Tulsa County District Court et al
as 4:2021cv00433
Plaintiff:
Travis Dray Stewart
Defendant:
Tulsa County District Court and State of Oklahoma, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phelps v. Turn Key Health Clinics, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00365
Plaintiff:
Dunniven Orlando Phelps
Defendant:
Turn Key Health Clinics, LLC, Richard Dutra, Patty Buchanan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huskey v. Payne County Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2021cv00434
Plaintiff:
Katie Huskey
Defendant:
Payne County Sheriff's Department, Gina Hutchinson and Ryan Lassley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Mays v. Grady County Law Enforcement Center et al
as 4:2021cv00422
Plaintiff:
Otis Mays
Defendant:
Grady County Law Enforcement Center, Sergent Nye, Sgt Sheldon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boles v. Dalton et al
as 4:2021cv00303
Plaintiff:
Clifford Thomas Boles
Defendant:
Turn Key Health Clinics, LLC, Vicki Lynn Dalton, Bryan Patino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vue v. Dowling et al
as 4:2021cv00265
Defendant:
Janet Dowling and Aaron Peruskie
Plaintiff:
Ong Vue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Goulsby v. Dowling et al
as 4:2021cv00289
Plaintiff:
Clifford Lee Goulsby
Defendant:
Janet Dowling, Randy Harding, Aaron Peruskie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
