Cases 21 - 30 of 205
Knight v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
Thomas Knight
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, John Scully, Brent Sugg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00488
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Burke v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2021cv00404
Plaintiff:
Michele D Burke
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, The, G T Bynum, Mark Swinney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LeBlue et al v. Six Unknown U.S. Marshals Service Agents et al
as 4:2021cv00294
Plaintiff:
Geoheidi LeBlue, Estate of Corben Hunter Jones and George Myron Cardinal
Defendant:
Six Unknown U.S. Marshals Service Agents, Darryl LaCounte, Eddy Rice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kolb v. Mayes Emergency Services Trust Authority et al
as 4:2021cv00209
Defendant:
Mayes Emergency Services Trust Authority, Board of County Commissioners of Mayes County, John Does and others
Plaintiff:
Marshall Jake Kolb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fink v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2021cv00189
Defendant:
Jenny Deckard, State of Oklahoma, Cherrie Wheeler and others
Plaintiff:
Patsy Fink
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Franklin et al
as 4:2020cv00362
Defendant:
Justin Finney, John Doe and Wendell Franklin
Plaintiff:
Melvin L Bailey, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buttler v. City of Sperry et al
as 4:2020cv00355
Defendant:
City of Sperry and John Carr
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ray Buttler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
