Cases 11 - 20 of 109
Fortney v. Doe et al
as 4:2022cv00277
Defendant:
MCR Investors, LLC also known as MCR Hotels doing business as Hampton Inn of Bixby / South Tulsa, John Doe, Todd Blish and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Fortney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Garrison v. Parker
as 4:2022cv00130
Petitioner:
Matthew Len Garrison
Respondent:
David Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lamb et al v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2022cv00055
Plaintiff:
Joshua D Lamb, Matthew C Lay, Eric D Acosta and others
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, George Theron Bynum and Jack Blair
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Russell v. Ballard
as 4:2021cv00272
Plaintiff:
Jason Curtis Russell
Defendant:
Matthew J Ballard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McHaney v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2021cv00262
Plaintiff:
Matthew McHaney
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland v. Atlas General Contractors, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00220
Defendant:
John Michael Owen, Kimberly Floyd Owen, Lisa Barby Diangelo and others
Plaintiff:
Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burke v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2021cv00131
Defendant:
Matthew Willis, Sarah Kessler, City of Tulsa, Oklahoma and others
Plaintiff:
Taylor Burke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Cummins v. Martin
as 4:2021cv00083
Respondent:
Jimmy Martin
Petitioner:
Matthew Cummins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brister v. Universal Field Services, Inc.
as 4:2020cv00141
Defendant:
Universal Field Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Matthew Brister
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Bromlow et al v. D & M Carriers, LLC dba Freymiller
as 4:2020cv00062
Plaintiff:
Matthew Bromlow, Johnny Walters and Benny Stewart
Defendant:
D & M Carriers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
